PTR Changelog 2018-08-28
-
the instant I spawn a creep (regardless of purpose), I lose 30% of the energy cost of that creep instantly, which I don't think makes any sens
When you buy a brand new car from a dealer, you instantly lose 30% of its market price, and it makes perfect sense.
-
When you buy a brand new car from a dealer, you instantly lose 30% of its market price, and it makes perfect sense.
Except that is one of the canonical examples of why car dealerships are infuriating to deal with, precisely b/c it doesn't make sense.
If you want to restrict the player's ability to convert between raw energy and creeps, even if its a design choice I personally don't agree with, thats still fine.
The issue is, this doesn't really fix the problem that you claim you want to solve. If you want to transfer a large amount of energy via creeps, then using
HEALparts is still going to be a better option then usingCARRYparts (unless you want to use boosts, which was still the case even before this change).
-
@issacar The solution that you propose is way more breaking to the game balance, it will deprecate almost any tactic and calculation of every player made from the game launch.
-
I am well aware of that fact and would not seriously propose you to implement such a change as stated. I was simply pointing out the core issue and why it exists in the first place and to put into perspective how your proposed change relates to the problem which it tries to solve.
Either way, it won't seriously impact me as I don't actively use this method for energy transport (precisely b/c I think its counter-intuitive to transport energy with anything other then
CARRY).
-
@artch Are we going to use real world examples to justify one's stance? Can you heal in the real world? No? So we should remove it.
I agree with Issacar, and believe the main problem isn't recycleCreep - but CARRY, and the cost of the part. I know you feel you have it all balanced out and thought out, but there are some balance issues with CARRY, and has been from the beginning. Of all the body parts, CARRY is the one with the most changes, from it creating fatigue to how it's minerals work.
@artch do you believe CARRY right now is balanced?
-
@likeafox Whoah whoah what do you have against doctors healing? I personally find the unflagging cooperation of thousands of individuals far more unlikely, we should add a rebellion mechanic to screeps.
Remember when the carry boost also made you require more move parts to get around? I'm all in favor of making logical changes to get it in a more balanced state. Honestly I think harvest would be another good one to look at, maybe it should make you mildly more efficient as well as faster.
What would people feel a balanced amount for carry to handle? I'm not sure it would be a good idea to increase the price of carry, given how crucial it is in low level rooms.
-
FWIW I have roughly as many transport creeps as I do harvesting creeps
-
@davaned said in PTR Changelog 2018-08-28:
I personally find the unflagging cooperation of thousands of individuals far more unlikely, we should add a rebellion mechanic to screeps.
What about ant colonies? I haven't heard of any rebellions in there. And creeps on their own definitely don't have the intelligence to be called sentient beings
-
In terms of CARRY, a fun suggestion would be 100 Holding for 125 energy - and each tier boost 200/300/400. No changes to recycleCreep so this would make the heal/move vs carry/move more interesting, Spawn 300 - can do 2Carry/1Move.
-
@likeafox said in PTR Changelog 2018-08-28:
In terms of CARRY, a fun suggestion would be 100 Holding for 125 energy - and each tier boost 200/300/400. No changes to recycleCreep so this would make the heal/move vs carry/move more interesting, Spawn 300 - can do 2Carry/1Move.
Seems like a pretty massive rebalance to carry with quite a few side effects. Most notably, full size haulers would now be larger than containers, which would have a big impact on general energy harvesting.
-
I kind of feel like no matter what size carry parts are (within reason), you'd always wish they could be bigger
-
@tigga said in PTR Changelog 2018-08-28:
Most notably, full size haulers would now be larger than containers, which would have a big impact on general energy harvesting.
I'm sorry, but I fail to see how having a hauler larger than container can be bad -- just make smaller haulers, or have one hauler service multiple containers. Besides, boosted haulers right now can be larger than containers already.
I'm kind of with likeafox here, it's not a problem with creep recycling, but rather with how limited CARRY part is.
-
@orlet said in PTR Changelog 2018-08-28:
@tigga said in PTR Changelog 2018-08-28:
Most notably, full size haulers would now be larger than containers, which would have a big impact on general energy harvesting.
I'm sorry, but I fail to see how having a hauler larger than container can be bad -- just make smaller haulers, or have one hauler service multiple containers. Besides, boosted haulers right now can be larger than containers already.
I didn't say it was bad. I said it would have a big impact on energy harvesting. A few things:
- Smaller haulers are less efficient. This is not a solution.
- As far as I'm aware most people don't run multiple containers per hauler. I agree this is what you'd want to aim for to be efficient but it adds a lot of complexity and changes some fundamental aspects of remote harvesting (eg. it makes one soruce rooms less attractive, it makes sources close to each other more attractive). Lots of people have lots of code that'd have to be rewritten. I consider this a big impact and as such it's not a change that should be made without serious consideration.
- Nobody (AFAIK) uses boosted carry for general hauling from sources. There are a few very narrow cases where it's almost economical but for the most part it's just a waste of resources.
-
I too think problem lies with CARRY part, not HEAL part. Specifically with how much energy CARRY can carry. And I agree that balancing should break as little code as possible.
So my proposition is: add another part that can only carry energy, but can carry more of it. Nobody gets his code broken (everything works as before), transition to new, more economical part can be pretty easy for everybody and HEAL mules becomes a lot less attractive.
I'm not sure what parameters should new part have exactly, but it should allow carrying more energy than it and MOVE parts cost, so that transporting energy over large distances (when only one round trip is possible) would still be economical. Probably making CARRY+MOVE only creeps live longer would do the trick too.
Hmm, that gives me another idea - make HEAL creeps live shorter, similar to CLAIM parts mechanics? (That one is game breaking though)
-
I kinda like the compressed energy idea or the ability to convert some mineral(s) directly to energy.
A capacitor part also sounds very interesting, but I suspect that will just make carry a rarely used part (maybe that's ok?).
However, just buffing up the carry boosts might be enough to fix the healcarry problem. I think it's quite apparent that the boosts not powerful enough because no one uses them. Make a T1 boosted carry equal to heal carry at range 50; (+200 instead of +50?). Plus this will have minimal impact on existing code since the boosts is nearly unused.
-
I think it's quite apparent that the boosts not powerful enough because no one uses them.
I use full-boosted transports to receive ~10k of energy once I have storage built (just to store boosts recovered from recycled transports). As far as I know, many military players use carry boost to have rcl6 at enemy territory as fast as possible (and it's really fast, I'm able to raise a room in less than 50k ticks). So when you say "nearly unused" I feel like I disagree.
-
@o4kapuk just because they're used in one situation and just because you use them doesn't mean they're in a good place.
Another way to make carry boosts more useful would be to make them more easily available. If they were found in caravans or the upcoming strongholds then you'd be able to get them at lower than cost. If you get them at less than cost it's much more economical to use them in more situaitons. They'd also possibly appear on the market at lower than cost.
It would also be nice if we could see a reaction time decrease for carry boosts.
-
Another way of making carry boosts more popular is fixing an alternative delivery method, MOVE/HEAL haulers, for example. Wait, oh shi~~
-
I must reinforce o4kapuk's point. I myself rely on carry boosts in a number of combat scenarios.
I use carry boosts for:
- transports into (potentially quite far) forts deep into enemy territory
- fully boosted wall builders in defense/siege scenarios
- "thief" units to quickly drain a storage/terminal that has been exposed
- micro transport units to save spawn time when the room of origin is scheduled to spawn a large offensive operation
Those scenarios are just off the top of my head. To be honest, on my personal list of boost rankings, carry is actually pretty far up. Harvest remains the most useless boost imho, followed by attack boost (not currently in my meta).
-
IMO, a solution for harvest boosts is to make them act like build/upgrade boosts: instead of having x4 harvest rate and depleting the source in 10 ticks, instead they increase the energy gain by 50/70/100% without affecting the amount the source loses. Thus, harvest boosts could be used to double mining profits in an operation.
