I'd like some stuff my creeps on MMO could show off instead Like a banner or something!

While I generally like the idea of seasonal servers, I don't truly agree with the pricing model right there. Namely, having to pay for both access and cpu sub to be competitive not only sounds like pay-to-win, but also like double dipping to me. It just feels... wrong.

Here's my ideas on how you could go about this to make it a bit more fair to everyone:

1. Drop the cpu sub effect on seasonal shards. Leave it to be MMO specific, and allow everyone on the seasonal shards pay for entry, and have a specific cpu limit (say 100 for everyone). This puts everyone on equal footing (isn't that the goal for the seasonal servers?). Adjust the access cost/seasons pass accordingly, if needed.
2. Keep the sub cpu effect, but create completely separate shards for cpu-unlimited (normal 300 cpu cap) and 20-cpu shard, each with their own, separate leaderboards. This way we'll have equal footing for the subscribers and non-subscribers, leaving them to compete against their equals. Maybe even have separate goals for each of the shards?

@xenofix said in Pathfinder cannot find path within one room:

Luckily I know A* very well. But I always thought there are two implementations in screeps. One PathFinder written in C++ by General and a JS JPS version, which is the default in moveTo. The C++ PathFinder could be activated as default for moveTo by PathFinder.use(true), which is deprecated now. Did something change here? Is JPS still the default path finder or is it all PathFinder only now?

It's been the PathFinder by default for everything for a few years now.

Absolutely, the top source is accessible for mining diagonally from 14,18. I have a similar case in my room over here: https://screeps.com/a/#!/room/shard1/E29N12

This issue has been fixed with yesterday's path, thank you.

Indeed this is the intended behaviour, and the only way to remove unwanted construction sites that are not your own. To prevent such site stomping you can build a rampart first around the place you're going to build a more expensive structure at.

Agreed on the overly steep difference between the Lv4 and Lv5 stronkholds. But I also do have a feeling that Lv5 only seems strong now, until someone can figure out how to cheese it...

Still, I'd love to have a few extra levels to bridge the gap between these.

It would appear that the .store update has broken the old .ghodium property for nukers built after the Oct 15th patch.

Expected behaviour:

> Game.getObjectById('5da6ffc57f19355e9360bac7').ghodium
< 0

Current (broken) behaviour:

> Game.getObjectById('5da6ffc57f19355e9360bac7').ghodium
< undefined

Rooms with confirmed broken nukers this way: shard3/E33N11, shard3/E31N13. Both were built shortly after the patch.

As a result, code relying on older nuker.ghodium < nuker.ghodiumCapacity behaviour for refilling falls flat on its face and nukers just sit there empty.

You can enable power in non-owned rooms after they became unowned. And the only way to reset it is to claim it, then un-claim it.

@deft-code said in Newb question: What RCL level is required for SK harvesting?:

Those invaders can be T1 boosted in the SK rooms and T3 boosted in the portal room.

Invaders can be T3-boosted in both SK and portal rooms.