Technical Issues and Bugs

• 

  to delete
  • Moria

  1
  1
  Posts
  2714
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  UTF-8 characters committed with GitHub gets garbled
  • linucc

  1
  1
  Posts
  3086
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Fix problems when accessing game on mobile browsers
  • Klepacz

  1
  1
  Posts
  2870
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Expired SSL Certficate
  • DoctorZuber

  2
  2
  Posts
  3107
  Views

  

  The issue with the certificate is resolved now, we apologize for the inconvenience.
• 

  Two creeps at the same position
  • CursedFlames

  2
  2
  Posts
  3527
  Views

  

  I've seen the results of something similar twice today, both in the same place: E37N38, x: 29, y: 33.   I suspect it's the same cause as CursedFlames mentioned: creep moving into position at the same time as a creep spawns into it. It really snarls up my traffic management until one of them dies.
• 

  army killed by an exploit
  • R33T4RD

  3
  3
  Posts
  4414
  Views

  

  I couldn't get the replay to load on my tablet, so I apologize if I'm interpreting the situation incorrectly. If he's claiming a room when your army gets there, you could try sending a CLAIM creep ahead to place a reservation on the room before your main force gets there?  It would still be possible for him to claim when the CLAIM creep enters the room, but it means you're putting a 650-cost creep into the DMZ instead of a full military wave. It sounds like your best recourse is going to end up being waiting out his attention span (chain-claiming/respawning isn't overly productive for gaining GCL).  It's a lame tactic but I don't think there's much else I can suggest to handle it.  
• 

  StructureSpawn.createCreep creates high cpu-load
  • MarkusF

  3
  3
  Posts
  4571
  Views

  

  I was passing custom names to make sure, that the name generation is not responsible for the long execution time.
• 

  Calling notifyWhenAttacked(false) on spawning creep returns -4
  • Dissi

  1
  1
  Posts
  1515
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Simulator structures (towers anyway) building in 1 tick
  • awr000

  2
  2
  Posts
  3866
  Views

  

  Slight correction, checking again Tower has a cost of 100 in sim, not 1
• 

  [Bug] Was able to claim reserved controller
  • Driven

  2
  2
  Posts
  2935
  Views

  

  This was a bug indeed. Thanks for reporting, fixed.
• 

  StructureLab.runReaction(...) throws exception
  • MarkusF

  2
  2
  Posts
  3472
  Views

  

  I can only guess, that my script accidently puts a catalyzed resource into one of the input labs. But you should change the ingredient check from, to handle this, too. if (!C.REACTIONS[lab1.mineralType][lab2.mineralType] || this.mineralType && this.mineralType != C.REACTIONS[lab1.mineralType][lab2.mineralType]) { return C.ERR_INVALID_ARGS; } to if (!C.REACTIONS[lab1.mineralType] || !C.REACTIONS[lab1.mineralType][lab2.mineralType] || this.mineralType && this.mineralType != C.REACTIONS[lab1.mineralType][lab2.mineralType]) {return C.ERR_INVALID_ARGS;}
• 

  Pasting the same value in the editor result in removed value
  • stybbe

  3
  3
  Posts
  5490
  Views

  

  Ok so I looked into this issue and debugged it myself. The bug is not in the ace editor but in the https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-ace. They override the onChange event and have some "hack" that doesn't work correctly. I made a local change in my javascript and modified it to always set the value with ngModel.$setViewValue(newValue); and this bug did no longer occur. I'm no expert in Angular so I've no idea what their hack is trying to accomplish.
• 

  Game.maps.describeExits() takes an obscenely large amount of cpu
  • tedivm

  8
  8
  Posts
  9944
  Views

  

  Looks good, taking between 0.002 and 0.2 CPU each call, even on the first call.
• 

  update exports.checkStructureAgainstController to use less CPU
  • Dissi

  2
  2
  Posts
  2055
  Views

  

  Not really. If it always returns true, then you can place and build any amount of construction sites of any structures. This method is used in many places, it's complicated.
• 

  creep.owner != creep.room.controller.owner
  • Lupus

  4
  4
  Posts
  6884
  Views

  

  This is intended. Comparing objects is considered a bad practice in JavaScript.
• 

  'Open local Folder' returns 'NaNdefault'
  • Xtrem532

  1
  1
  Posts
  2640
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Unusual high used-cpu values right at the start of the loop
  • MarkusF

  5
  5
  Posts
  6327
  Views

  

  GarbaceCollection makes sense. As I said, now it settled down a lot. My intuition tells me, that it's worse, the more people are online in the slack-channel. Maybe the more people are working on their scripts and regularly commit them to screeps, the harder the garbage collection hits. However, I don't have any statistics for this, just my intuition. But as long as I have an explanation for what it could have been, I'm quite fine with it.
• 

  Spawning Creeps are Recyclable
  • Pathurs

  1
  1
  Posts
  3024
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Undefended center rooms in NW area
  • CBoon

  2
  2
  Posts
  3115
  Views

  

  Fixed, thanks for reporting.
• 

  Missing Source Keepers Lairs
  • NhanHo

  3
  3
  Posts
  4183
  Views

  

  Fixed, thanks for reporting.