[Discussion] Uniformity of the world

[Davaned]

@Jaycephus I've been assuming that these sorts of things won't be in claimable room, but will rather be in contested neutral territory like power banks. That way it's not about being lucky and claiming a room, but rather players in surrounding rooms battling it out, and further players claiming rooms near it.

@Kasami I think thats a good idea. Some sort of non-spawnable/claimable shard with increased resources is a reoccurring idea, it would give players something to work towards taming and with how shard portals work, it would increase player interaction from different map regions. Between the two, I think I'd rather have it not claimable, given that once it gets saturated there will be zero chance for new players to break in to entrenched positions given your specified portal limitations.

[o4kapuk]

If I understand correctly, the issue here is that such region would serve as a 'portal hub' connecting everyone to everyone (unless we design and implement a non-abusable restrictions).

Plus, I must say that we already have regions of neutral non-claimable rooms with increased resources generation, they are in 3x3 square in the middle of each sector.

[Orlet]

Can such area be a one-way trip for creeps? That would solve the "connects everyone to everyone" problem. Players can send creeps in and claim rooms to create colonies, however, they could not launch attacks from inside the sector on outside stuff. While players from outside would be able to.

At least that's how I imagine that suggestion.

[MrFaul]

Wouldn't it much more interesting if they had to use some "altar" to send it back to the "mortal realm"?
So it is a one way ticket to a potential bounty but the entering creeps are l4d.

Thinking about a similar mechanic like the helicopter thing in the Division.

[Tigga]

I do think it'd be nice if shards had different colour schemes. Seems like an easy change to make things a lot more visually interesting at least.

As far as other diversity, I'd be all in favour. One of the "problems" with screeps is that there's not much to fight for. Resoures are not scarse and it's not too hard to find space. If 25% of sectors (for example) held some long lasting (say, 1 million tick) unique resource it would be interesting to have wars to fight for control of that resource. Power/space/time/energy "relics" would all suit and would allow players to actually compete for some bonus.

RIght now we have centre rooms and we have highway rooms, both providing resources that could be fought over, but IMO they're not really valuable or unique enough to be interesting.

[Ciber]

I enthusiastically support different color pallets.

[MrFaul]

I think it would be more interesting to make the catalyst really valuable by restricting it to source keeper rooms and very low yield.
Also screw the uniformity it would be much more interesting if a sector had only one type of mineral besides a surplus of Hydrogen and Oxygen.

I would even make it so that the resource spots have a mineral vane probability what the next regeneration could spawn in a specific room.

i.e.:

• 70% U, 20% O, 10% H a high value room since it is almost a given to get Utrium after each regeneration
• 45% O, 45% H, 2.25% U, 2.25% L, 2.25% K, 2.25% Z, 1% X pretty much worthless but might give you now and then a nice reward for continues mining
• 50% X, 10% O, 10% H, 7.5% U, 7.5% L, 7.5% K, 7.5% Z could be a source keeper room

This artificially creates a unbalance and makes minerals way more valuable then now.
It also would generate the need for some kind of mineral exchange between players in whatever form this may take place.

[artch]

We're going to introduce some new mechanic soon that will diversify resource distribution in the world a little bit. Stay tuned!

[Smokeman]

I have been avoiding this topic because I don't think adding a 'new' mechanic to further diversify resource distribution is a good idea at all.

Resources are ALREADY diversified. Many sectors have few rooms with certain minerals already, and there is already a shortage of "good rooms" (Ones with 2 sources, sufficiently open to develop easily.) All what we have now does is give advantage to people with high enough GCL and sufficient combat code to be able to spread out collecting all the "good" rooms at the expense of underdeveloped players and alliances.

Making this even worse seems like a bad idea.

There is already an area in EVERY SECTOR (As o4kapuk has pointed out.) that have hugely increased resource generation, but few people utilize this because the ROI of extracting those resources effectively is very daunting. (And in case anyone says "Learn to code." I already extract from the center rooms.) I don't have to fight for those rooms at all, FEW PEOPLE WANT THEM.

The core problem with any of these schemes I see here is it ignores the root issue... transporting things with creeps is exponentially more expensive the farther away / bigger the resource is. The one proposed feature I have seen that would actually fix this is the Strongholds. By incentivizing a player to well control a sector, they can keep the strongholds suppressed and thus greatly increasing the ROI for the center rooms.

So: Two things to improve this: One: Implement strongholds. Two: Fix the market so it's easier to use it to trade the minerals you have for the minerals you want at a 'fair' price. (Fair meaning consistent in the local shard.)

[artch]

Spoiler: it will be new resources, not the existing ones.

[MrFaul]

@artch well OPS we know, but just adding a new resource doesn't fix the problem.

IMO:
Ressource are to plentiful to be traded efficiently besides the high level compounds, and virtually useless for low level rooms.
To change that it would be the easiest to make the distribution of different types very sparse.
And move the boosting to the spawning process where the spawn and extensions need to carry the resources.
This way even low level rooms benefit from them and the optional bounty from NPCs if they decide to go on the hunt.

The game feels currently very linear without a lot rewarding for trying different options.
Well most of them are only a option if you are high level anyways which is really sad.

[artch]

@mrfaul Nope, wrong guess! It's not ops. Ops are only generated by Operators.

[MrFaul]

@artch so you add a another unnecessary level of complexity to the game instead of refining the current ones.
I really hope it is something that is actually useful and not a feature creep.

Don't get me wrong I like new stuff and I'm happy that you are working on it but still,
the current gameplay doesn't feel satisfying. Especially for new players since "high level" players seem to be impossible to beat.
Which kinda is true. You can boost your creep to ridicules stats, that they are able to just crush any unboosted creep.
Remember the "hit back" discussion.

[Tigga]

@mrfaul said in [Discussion] Uniformity of the world:

Well most of them are only a option if you are high level anyways which is really sad.

A very small proportion of the game is spent under RCL 8, and anybody playing for multiple months is likely to have multiple RCL 8 rooms. I don't think changing low level rooms is needed: while you're leveling your rooms as a new player there are many new things to code up. I don't really see the need for low level boosting: you can either reinforce from another room, or you're unlikely to have code well developed enough for boosting anyway.

The game feels currently very linear without a lot rewarding for trying different options.

For non-linearity and "trying different options" you really have to have a combination of locking people into decisions and outcomes of decisions not being clear cut. That's hard in a programming game. We have it in the code-design, and to a lesser extend room layouts and combat strategies.

so you add a another unnecessary level of complexity to the game instead of refining the current ones

They've added a lot of refinements over the last few updates (eg. 64 rooms in pathfinder, IVM). The complexity they've added (eg. tunnels/tombstones/pull/unboost) isn't really that complex and you really don't lose much by completely ignoring it.

You can boost your creep to ridicules stats, that they are able to just crush any unboosted creep.

I do kinda agree that boosts should be less powerful, as should towers, as should repair power. I'm not sure such a rebalance is needed though and I'm also not sure what I have in mind is what you have in mind...

[Tigga]

New resources sound exciting. My ideas for what it could be:

1. A resource that we could break down into minerals (eg. "unreact"). That would give a dense source of minerals that would require some processing to make useful. Doesn't seem that "special" when it comes to creating interesting areas to fight for.
2. Unique boosts that can't be created. A fourth tier could be added that's even more powerful but also rare/non-uniform and can't be reacted to. That'd certainly create resource wars.
3. Some sort of new form of generic resource that could be used to buff structures. For example towers could use this resource optionally alongside energy to increase damage output by 1.5x. Seems to overlap a bit too much with power creeps.
4. ???

[MrFaul]

@tigga said in [Discussion] Uniformity of the world:

They've added a lot of refinements over the last few updates (eg. 64 rooms in pathfinder, IVM). The complexity they've added (eg. tunnels/tombstones/pull/unboost) isn't really that complex and you really don't lose much by completely ignoring it.

Indeed while those are neat little (and big) things, I intended to refer to the already existing mineral mechanic.
I personally think the boosting and mining mechanics are awesome but they don't feel polished and well balanced.

Yes their math looks good on a spread sheet but that isn't the point for a game, and it is a game after all.
I like to see my little screeps doing their thing but currently it is pretty obvious what they are going to do,
since their environment they live in is pretty sterile.

The upcoming strongholds will definitely liven thing up.
But by giving low-mid level rooms more things to do and power they become much more interesting.

Currently there isn't much need for either site to attack each other simply because there is absolutely no benefit to it.
The low-mid level creeps just get crushed the tick they enter the high level room.
And the high level player has no interest in the low-mid level room since it wouldn't be much afford to stamp it into the ground besides the fact that it isn't even worth to do so.

However by having several low-mid level rooms capable of boosting you might have to reconsider since they could actually become a real threat.
By reducing the overall mineral amount and spreading them out in "cluster of a single type" they become a complete new value, something worth fighting for.
Also by moving the boosting to the spawning process the minerals would have to share their space with the energy with the neat side effect that fully boosted monster creeps are more difficult to create. Instead you have to make more informed decisions what exactly you are spawning, like saved spawn time by boosting or use more energy and wait a little longer to do the same work.

[Ciber]

How about a resource that is not a resource? Rivers: A tile with a flow direction. Pushes creeps 1 tile downstream per tick. MOVEs happen after the push, so you always go at least one tile when crossing a river. Roads on a river tile remove the push effect. (bridges) This simple mechanic would provide massive room for complexity, and how you distribute them gives lots of options. If you have multiple rivers flow into or out of a room it becomes capable of controlling more territory more efficiently. But it also introduces a security weakness. Someone could setup in a room upstream and spawn creeps in the water with all attack no move, letting them get a cheap beachead.

[Flyasd1]

@ciber Interesting idea. What about ramparts and walls can you build this structure on river?

[wtfrank]

@mrfaul

70% U, 20% O, 10% H a high value room a completely worthless room

45% O, 45% H, 2.25% U, 2.25% L, 2.25% K, 2.25% Z, 1% X pretty much worthless this room is quite attractive to me, but nowhere near as attractive as a 100% H room

50% X, 10% O, 10% H, 7.5% U, 7.5% L, 7.5% K, 7.5% Z could be a source keeper room far less attractive than either a 100% X room or a 100% H room

[wtfrank]

@tigga slightly differently colour schemes would be quite a simple change (I imagine) but it would make each shard feel rather different. this is a pretty good idea IMO.