3. Interesting novice area

Interesting novice area


  • Dear Artem,

    I apologize, but I am indeed having difficulties understanding the purpose of these zones. From your feedback in the recent discussions on this topic, I was under the impression that these areas were to stimulate a higher density of players in the map. Your reply now, suggests otherwise. I would like to address both possible intentions just in case.

    First, these areas do not increase player density in the map because they get fully cleared in 95% of the cases once they open.

    Second, are these "experimentation" zones really fruitful? These areas generate frustration for the players affected by them. The majority of players joining the game which may make use of these areas are not aware of these limits. They settle there hoping to carve out an empire of their own. It is unfair for both sides.

    Let's reduce this problem to its core:

    1. Is the experience of a new player better in a proper novice area or in the makeshift zones?
    2. Are the random novice areas generating frustration for existing players?

    Answering these two questions, makes the discussion much easier.

    I would also like to point out, that the fear of empty areas suddenly covering the map is unjustified. Deadlypineapple despawned recently and his area was gobbled up within a few days. Veteran players are constantly being pushed out from the map center and currently have no real choice but to spawn into the novice areas.

    I think what bugs me the most about this is that Atlan is clearly active. He has occupied that sector for over a month now. He dropped some of his reservations for 3 days to engage in war against Opptic and Magnus from E5S45. I can only imagine what a complete disaster this novice area would have been if the war would have lasted a bit longer.

    Doing this repeatedly is seen as an insult by the veteran players. You are risking the loss of dedicated, active and paying members of the community, for no real reason.

    Kind regards,
    A concerned citizen

    PS: This post is justified because it deals specifically with the creation of a dysfunctional novice area.

    The post by Dissi on this topic was a complaint about the frequency with which these areas get regenerated.

    My first post about this topic was a complaint about the logic of these areas and the fact that the mechanism was not documented at all.


  • Atavus, you still seem to not get the entire point of novice areas. They are not supposed to be a starter platofrm to further growth of players in this region.

    With all due respect, I don't think that is the common interpretation of novice areas. I think players think of them as a legitimate safe place to begin the game. If you intended these middle-of-the-map novice areas to offer some lesser amount of protection, you shouldn't rely on players to just "get it", it should be clearly stated in the introduction documentation. Keep in mind, these are often brand new players that are unaware of the game mechanics and not exactly in a position to judge the relative safety of different types of novice areas. Fourteen days is a significant amount of time to invest in your empire only to have it crushed because you didn't realize it wasn't a safe place after all (despite the enticing green colored rooms clearly marked "novice area")

  • Culture

    I agree with Bonzai and Atavus. It's absolutely bad for new player experience.

    I wipe my novice zone out every time. It takes time, it's tedious and not fun at all. I've also NEVER seen a player respawn after I wiped out their base. Meaning I'm essentially wiping out your revenue streams.


  • I agree this is a really bad mechanic, but there also needs to be something done about stronger players owning 4-5 blocks with only a few rooms in each block (so huge open spaces that now gets turned into novice areas).  If the older players end up having no conflict because they have so many options of new rooms and no players ever dare to spawn near them it will also get boring.  Maybe we should try to get a mechanic to prevent it from being needed for novice areas to spawn like that.  For example limit the amount of blocks a player can claim in based on their GCL.  For example you can claim in a new block every 10 GCL's forcing you to own more rooms per area (just an idea will obviously need some work to be practical).

  • Dev Team

    Keep in mind, these are often brand new players that are unaware of the game mechanics and not exactly in a position to judge the relative safety of different types of novice areas. Fourteen days is a significant amount of time to invest in your empire only to have it crushed because you didn’t realize it wasn’t a safe place after all (despite the enticing green colored rooms clearly marked “novice area”)

    I disagree. If a player is afraid of respawning and losing his 15-days old novice rooms, then probably Screeps is not a good choice for him (at least the official world). His real investment was to produce the code, not the structures.

  • Dev Team

    I’ve also NEVER seen a player respawn after I wiped out their base. Meaning I’m essentially wiping out your revenue streams.

    We’ve seen it hundreds of times though.

  • Culture

    Aside from proximo who spawned in that area no-one respawned yet.


  • Simple questions:

    Is the experience of a new player better in a proper novice area or in the makeshift zones?

    Are the random novice areas generating frustration for existing players?

     

    @chaos the issue you bring forth has not happened anywhere so far. I'd suggest we deal with such a problem should it actually occur.

     

  • Dev Team

    I got an interesting idea of how to prevent such rooms to be noviced, and also warn other players to not spawn in it.

    We introduce a new StructureController property, say, sign. It’s a simple text property that can be set by any creep who reached this controller in close range, even if it’s an unowned or hostile controller. An example usage:

    creep.signController(creep.room.controller, "I'm going to claim this room very soon");

    Then this text (with the author and date) will be visible to all players in the controller sidepanel and the room sidepanel here:

    If the controller is “signed” recently, then this room won’t be converted to a novice area, and this warning will clearly explain some player intentions.

  • Dev Team

    Is the experience of a new player better in a proper novice area or in the makeshift zones?

    Are the random novice areas generating frustration for existing players?

    The experience for all players will be worse if we stop making novice areas in inner regions, and desolate empty spaces begin to grow.

  • Culture

    I like the idea however:

    > If the controller is “signed” recently

    What's defined as recently? Will signed messages expire?

  • Dev Team

    They won't expire, but the date is displayed, so we can decide accordingly.

  • SUN

    I actually like ChaosDMG suggestion of limiting the number of blocks a player may claim rooms in.

    I do not want the world to turn up into big regularly-wiped-but-unclaimed zones.


  •  But that might be a problem, considering there have to be some players who would already be above that limit


  • Artem...

     

    ...

     

    I love you!

     

    That suggestion is extraordinary. Perfect for dealing with everyone's concerns.


  • A really great idea, and should offer a bit of fun even beyond its intended purpose. Looking forward to a player doing something like leaving a trail of riddles.

    I disagree. If a player is afraid of respawning and losing his 15-days old novice rooms, then probably Screeps is not a good choice for him (at least the official world). His real investment was to produce the code, not the structures.

    I think this is very true, we need to make sure this message is being consistently displayed. Most players really dislike the experience of "losing" but in screeps it can be really instructive and part of the fun. It really comes down to how they interpet the event, and most people are predisposed to interpret it in a negative way. I think there are many people who screeps is "a good choice for" if they can just be reminded of that.

    I know there are already some game messages that convey the idea (like the one displayed when you need to respawn), but it might be worth thinking about what other areas to drive this point home. 

  • Dev Team

    Controller signing introduced in this changelog.