@artch said in Draft: Store prototype API:
I'd say that
Store.getAmount()without arguments should return an object with all resources rather than one single number of total used capacity.
@artch I would say that Store.getAmounts() should return such an object. Store.getAmount() is "get the amount of whatever is in the store" 
Hello,
I like this proposal in this current state. Code will be much simpler for many situations.
The only improvement I'd favour would be to change store.getUsedCapacity([resourceType]) to store.getAmount([resourceType]), favoring concision to regularity, MrFaul's store.getStored looks a bit redundant to me, but I like the rest of his definition.