What's devs standpoint on writing to inactive segments?
As I understand from documentation, I'm supposed to activate up to 10 segments so I can read from them and they'll automatically be saved at the end of the tick. However the way it is implemented makes it possible to:
- Write to a segment without activating it in previous tick. Up to 10 segments can be saved.
- Activate 10 segments, read whatever is stored in them, then
for (let key in RawMemory.segments) delete RawMemory.segments[key];and then write to up to 10 different segments.
I see it as an unharmful undocumented behaviour, similar to memhack, but it also could be considered an exploit.