Topics created by CGamesPlay

From my understanding the respawn delay is meant to prevent abuse- such as a player jumping around and creating "safe mode barriers". I think a good compromise would be to waive the delay for the first respawn of the day, but then add it in to any respawn after that.

This wouldn't imply that 1 power spawn = 1 power creep, correct? Assuming one power spawn could have any number of power creeps "dedicated" to it, this is a pretty good idea. If you're saying 1 does = 1 though, then I'm completely against this since it would limit the number of possible power creeps to the number of power spawns, essentially defeating the idea of "going tall" vs "going wide" in building your empire.

There are strong server-side validations. That recent change wasn’t a security fix (the security fix was this one), it’s due to the need of being sure in underlying code behavior consistency. This would basically change all calls in the form of this.getActiveBodyParts() to calls in the form of storedGetActiveBodyParts.call(this). This is exactly the case now, see this commit. My proposal is to treat client-side validation as advisory/optional. We may consider adding an experimental option “Disable all client-side checks” in the future, when we introduce the script runtime options feature.

The PR is merged, thanks for contributing.