[Alliance] TMB

But I must say that any solution that implies optimization or heap increase can only be temporary. It's always just a matter of time when Totalschaden (or AzuraStar, or anybody) overgrows everything in the realm of reasonable possibilities then comes back asking for more heap. We'll discuss what we can do to solve it permanently somehow.

@mrfaul Well... not directly.

I wasn't able to reproduce the issue using the steps provided. Is the server you're experiencing issues with publicly available?

@duckymirror I was able to reproduce the issue with this replay, thank you very much, we'll investigate why is this happening and fix it.

Hello, the strange German dude,

Of course, implementing what you're talking about in Screeps is not an option. This change would decrease the number of tactics and use-cases of spawning and boosting mechanics (the example is, you can spawn 6-9-12 50parts creeps, renew them to have the same ttl using the spawner, then boost with labs), increasing logistics difficulty at the same time. This is exactly opposite to what we're trying to achieve in game design.

Regardless of that, I thank you for wording your idea here on the forum. While it can't be directly applied to the game, it still can be the source of inspiration in some other activities.

Any fresh replays?

A tunnel is a road through the wall, and if you're asking pathfinder to ignore roads, it does ignore all roads, including those that are in walls. Actually, it would be quite weird to expect otherwise. If you want a complex logic like 'ignore this road, but not that one', I'd say it's time to use CostMatrix-es.

Not a bug/As designed/Won't fix

@deft-code I'm ready to test the PR, please ping me with the link.

@warinternal thanks, we'll take a look.

The fix is deployed, thanks again for the report.