<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[More efficient client]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This is a super vague request as it involves a lot of work on your part (maybe?). But for what the client does it's incredibly inefficient.</p>
<p>Whether it's the steam client or running in chrome (The client being the worst culprit of the two), the game uses 2+ GB of memory and roughly 15+% of my CPU (i7-3770K). This would be easy to overlook if it ran well, but it doesn't as it stutters and is at times unresponsive.</p>
<p>tl;dr
This is far from my area of expertise but just speaking strictly as a consumer, the game runs terrible and is a massive resource hog. We're not talking crysis level detail... far from it, this could pass as a 2006 browser based game I played at school instead of paying attention in class.</p>
]]></description><link>http://screeps.com/forum/topic/2218/more-efficient-client</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 05:45:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://screeps.com/forum/topic/2218.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:22:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More efficient client on Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:31:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This is a super vague request as it involves a lot of work on your part (maybe?). But for what the client does it's incredibly inefficient.</p>
<p>Whether it's the steam client or running in chrome (The client being the worst culprit of the two), the game uses 2+ GB of memory and roughly 15+% of my CPU (i7-3770K). This would be easy to overlook if it ran well, but it doesn't as it stutters and is at times unresponsive.</p>
<p>tl;dr
This is far from my area of expertise but just speaking strictly as a consumer, the game runs terrible and is a massive resource hog. We're not talking crysis level detail... far from it, this could pass as a 2006 browser based game I played at school instead of paying attention in class.</p>
]]></description><link>http://screeps.com/forum/post/10460</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://screeps.com/forum/post/10460</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shibdib]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:31:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More efficient client on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/fwB98tL.png" alt="https://i.imgur.com/fwB98tL.png" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>http://screeps.com/forum/post/10461</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://screeps.com/forum/post/10461</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shibdib]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More efficient client on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Who cares 2GB is nothing.</p>
<p>If any perf work is going to be done, I would focus on the responsiveness of the client, not how many resources it uses.</p>
<p>my 2c</p>
]]></description><link>http://screeps.com/forum/post/10462</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://screeps.com/forum/post/10462</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[shedletsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More efficient client on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://screeps.com/forum/uid/56">@shedletsky</a> said in <a href="/forum/post/10462">More efficient client</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Who cares 2GB is nothing.</p>
<p>If any perf work is going to be done, I would focus on the responsiveness of the client, not how many resources it uses.</p>
<p>my 2c</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the client being resource hungry while also performing like crap go hand in hand.</p>
]]></description><link>http://screeps.com/forum/post/10464</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://screeps.com/forum/post/10464</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shibdib]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More efficient client on Invalid Date]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. If anything performance seems to be worse with the change from SVG graphics. Now when you zoom in inside a room the whole page stutters to a halt in chrome. I'm running an r9 280X and 3570k so those aren't the issue and this wasn't really a problem when SVG was in use.</p>
<p>The map view is also pretty bad with larger window sizes. Having the window set to 1440p, it takes about 5 seconds to load all the rooms in the map and just panning around is incredibly slow.</p>
<p>Strangely, firefox seems to have better performance at room level but worse at the map since it freezes the entire window until every room in view is loaded.</p>
]]></description><link>http://screeps.com/forum/post/10467</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://screeps.com/forum/post/10467</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hernanduer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>